Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #759674

Complaint Review: Cox Communications - Omaha Nebraska

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: shane51503 — Council Bluffs Iowa United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Cox Communications 11505 West Dodge Road Omaha, Nebraska United States of America

Cox Communications Used Modems Useless by Policy Omaha, Nebraska

*Consumer Comment: Wrong company

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I purchased a cable modem off of Craigslist to save $80 on the retail cost of the Motorola SBG6580. I called Cox and had my service activated with this modem, only to have my service "Temporarily Disabled" a few days later, with a Cox splash screen indicating that I need to call Cox to resolve the issue. 

Technical support finds nothing wrong with my billing or service (besides a weak signal, which Cox always seems to have) and they have me resetting my modem, and checking for service only to discover after a couple tries that my modem is still associated with the prior owner's account. They tell me they can do nothing about this association, and that the release must come from the prior owner. I wonder how the FTC can let Cox put a "policy" in place that turns a piece of hardware you legitimately bought from another owner into a paperweight. 

The old owner may call Cox to release it, but I already paid him, and he has been unresponsive to my attempts to contact him so far. Seems a little ridiculous that modems are so tightly tied to accounts as to be almost "non-transferable" especially when they remain tied to accounts that have been closed.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/02/2011 08:39 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/cox-communications/omaha-nebraska-68154/cox-communications-used-modems-useless-by-policy-omaha-nebraska-759674. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 Consumer Comment

Wrong company

AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Tuesday, August 02, 2011

Your problem is not with Cox it is with the previous seller.

This "policy" you complain about is one you would find with any provider.  To not get too technical, every modem has a unique number that is how Cox or any broadband ISP authorizes that modem to be used on their network.   They are not going to just let you move a modem from one account to another because you say you bought it off of Craigslist.

If you bought this from a LEGITIMATE seller it should be no problem to contact them and have them call Cox to remove that modem from their account.  But perhaps this wasn't legitimate,  Craigslist is known for having numerous scams and frauds as well as people selling stolen merchandise.  So if the seller is being "non-responsive" that may tell you all you need to know about how LEGITIMATE your transaction actually was. 

In the end you may in fact find out you bought a "hot" modem that is going to be good for nothing more than a lesson learned and expensive paperweight.


Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now